Log In   ·   Become A Member

Neighborhood Dog Park Debate Erupts Over Use Of Springs Park

Originally Posted: September 18, 2008

Aaron Boyd

  |   7 Comments · Print Article

Concerned Springs residents claim the entire park is essentially a 'dog park' and that it had become such naturally, through public use. Photos by Aaron Boyd

East Hampton - The Town of East Hampton has proposed sectioning off a portion of Springs Park exclusively for dogs. Half of the 22-acre park would be devoted to letting canines and their owners run free in a cordoned-off dog park. Members of the Springs community who have been using the entire park along with their pets for years attended the Sept. 16 Town Board work session at the Springs Firehouse to protest the proposal.

"We have had a person knocked over by a dog and a town employee bitten," East Hampton Town Supervisor William McGintee explained to the earnest audience, "We have to deal with this."

Scott Wilson, East Hampton's director of land acquisitions, presented a plan to fence in the rear 11 acres to allow for unleashed dogs without disrupting other park users. The Springs Park was acquired using the Community Preservation Fund (CPF), a two percent real estate transfer tax dedicated to buying open space, which attaches strict use requirements on properties purchased with public money. "CPF law says that this park and any other property has to be as inclusive as possible," Wilson explained, "It can't be exclusive to any specific user group."

A plan to fence in the rear 11 acres to allow for unleashed dogs without disrupting
other park users is being considered by the town board.

The front half of the park, stretching from the entrance on Three Mile Highway across the first 11 acres, would remain undeveloped as an open space park, save for re-cutting a single trail that runs through the center of the park, Wilson suggested. While the dog park is reserved for owners who want to let their pets exercise and play with other dogs, the open space portion of the park would be maintained and made available to all user groups except dog owners visiting with their dogs.

The town code does not have a provision that would require an owner to leash their dog, Wilson explained, yet does allow the board to require dogs be leashed while crossing specific no-dog areas, such as cemeteries and certain beaches. Under this proposal, the front half of Springs Park would have to ban dogs completely, except those passing through to the rear section.

"You can have a no dogs area and an off-leash area," Wilson asserted, "but there is no leash law in East Hampton." The town board would have to chose between instituting a leash law in the town code or designate the front 11 acres a no-dog area.

The 11-acre dog park would include benches and a number of ornamental pear trees moved from elsewhere on the parcel, as well as a little over a mile in trails, according to Wilson. The parcel would also be mowed frequently to ensure residents are able to maintain visual contact with their pets at all times. As proposed, Wilson projects the proposal will cost less than $200,000, with most of the work conducted in-house using town equipment.

Most dog parks are no more than an acre in size, according to Wilson. "There are only two larger dog parks in the whole world," he explained, "One is a sand pit in Kansas and one is in Oregon."

Dog owners are advised to curb their pets in this area.

The concerned Springs residents claimed the entire park was now a dog park and that it had become such naturally, through public use. Councilwoman Pat Mansir agreed with them, "You can do activities in other parks, but you can't do this anywhere else in town."

"There's nowhere a dog cannot go," Councilman Brad Loewen exclaimed. "There is no leash law in town."

"We have a lot of public space," Mansir asserted, "but here is something that has evolved on its own because there was a need."

The Public's Parks
While the dog owners were worried they would be losing half of their adopted park, they found an unlikely source of support against the division in Councilman Loewen, who opposed using the Springs Park as a dog park entirely.

"I'm not unhappy with providing a dog park," Loewen explained, "but to do away with a large portion of this park for an exclusive purpose, I just can't do it." Loewen would prefer the park remained open to everyone and another area be set aside for dogs.

Before Loewen became a member of the town council, he sat on the committee that advised the previous town board during the land acquisition. The committee decided to split the full 44-acre parcel into two separate sections, one reserved for conservation and the other for public use as Springs Park.

"The wooded area was to be sacred, nothing was supposed to be touched," according to Loewen, "The rest of the park was to be developed as a park," designed to accommodate all East Hampton residents. "If everyone took a small piece we could probably make it work," he surmised, "Now there's going to be an exclusive use for over half the park."

Supervisor McGintee viewed sectioning off the dog park as helping to make the park more available to all residents. "It's not putting 11 acres aside for dogs," he explained, "it's 11 acres for people who want to use the park, while being fenced off to protect other people who want to use this park safely."

"This [park] has to be available to all user groups," Supervisor McGintee contended.

"If this were the only park this town owns I could see making it all things to all people," Mansir claimed, "But it isn't, there are a lot of other places that we have."

Loewen disagreed, fearing that the public would lose its right to the open space if it were used for a single purpose. "What we're doing is we're restricting people," he claimed. "This is about uses, if you put a bench in there someone is going to come sit on the bench," Loewen continued, alluding that if there is a separate section for dogs, it will be used solely as a dog park, "If you put 10 benches in there, you'll have people filling up 10 benches."

The Town Board reached a consensus to take the proposal to public hearing to be scheduled at a later date. "We've spoken with a number of 'dog people' about this and they all seem to be O.K. with it," Councilman Pete Hammerle assured, afraid that only a small portion of the dog-owning community was present at the work session, "Hopefully everyone concerned will show up at the public hearing."

Supervisor McGintee viewed sectioning off the dog park as helping to make the park more available to all residents.

Guest (Monica) from Springs says::
It's very sad to hear that. U have been going every single day to this park for as long as 3 years and never saw any bad thing happened. I think the use of Common Sense is lost in this part of the world. Please, keep the park the way it is. Thank you
Apr 8, 2015 6:56 pm

Guest (Barbara Miller) from Springs Park says::
Leave the park the way it is. There are so many places people are allowed to go (nature trails/reserves, etc) in the Hamptons that dogs are not allowed. Please let this remain a place of freedom for dog owners and their pets to go. Anyone is welcome here. There is a bed egg in every bunch (humans included) and if one person gets bitten, we all must suffer? Accidents happen in all circumstances, that's life. I've been using the park for years with my dog and have never witnessed a problem. Everyone who uses the park watches and cleans up after their dog. I agree -- don't fix something that is not broken, please!
May 10, 2010 9:11 pm

Guest (dorelle destefano) from manor lane east hampton east hampton says::
please kept the dogs free....and let them learn the feeling of togetherness...
Jan 18, 2009 10:01 pm

Guest (MJ Martin) from East Hampton says::
And the East Hampton Town Board has nothing better to spend it's time evaluating or spend the CPF funds on at this time. Shame on you.
Oct 6, 2008 2:39 pm

Guest (Andy aka Dude) from East Hampton,N.Y. says::
Are you kidding me? There's enough "politics of change" going on. Leave the park the way it is or I'll suffer a political poop.
Oct 3, 2008 10:47 pm

Guest (Doug Cunningham) from Sag Harbor says::
Why does this park have to be for "everyone"? That has to be the stupidist thing I have ever heard. What if I didn't swim? Should the town provide services at the water if I can't use it? This subject is so ridiculus it hardly warrents a second thought, if it didn't make me so mad. It's a dog park. Dogs will be there. They get excited and they run and play. Sometimes they bark and growl and, oh my goodness, they sometimes make doo-doo! Newsflash!!! If you don't like dogs, if you are worried about stepping in something, if you can't stand the possibility of a dog jumping on you with an overly joyous greeting....Don't go to a dog park. Go to the beach or go to a trail or walk in town. I can think of a million analagies to make this whole thing sound absolutly absurd. The point is that it is just a simple dog park. From what I hear it's not even that nice. Make some rules about cleaning up after your dog. If your dog really causes trouble there, don't bring it anymore. If you insist on walking in the park and you aren't an animal lover, fine. Just be prepared for what might happen. Watch the "Dog Whisperer" before you go!
Sep 22, 2008 6:16 am

Guest (Jimmy Mac) from Amagansett says::
Think of all of the beautiful places there are in the town of East Hampton for one to sit and ponder or stroll and take in views. It is just amazing how lucky we are. Why is there so much concern about a piece of undeveloped land, the springs nursery, which is over grown with weeds, full of small animals, lots of insects and pretty much, dusty and dirty? Anyone who really wants to sit there to relax while there are so many other pleasant places available perhaps should be sent for psychiatric evaluation. This CPF purchased land is not supposed to be costing the tax payers a great deal of money to maintain and it isn't right now. What is the harm of having a social area for every single taxpayer to enjoy? If you happen to have a dog, then bring them. If not, still come. If you are afraid of dogs, then there are so many other choices for humans to make. Why would just a few angry individuals want to ruin something that brings peaceful pleasure to so many? Enough with the black top and night lighting and trying to fix things that are not broken. Please leave the Springs Nursery as the simple open space it currently is. We tax payers already spend enough money for other types of recreation that many of us will never us so please, work off your anger there! Thank you.
Sep 19, 2008 12:00 am


Submit Your Comment

Please note, you are not currently logged in. Your comment will be submitted as a guest.
To submit your comment as a member, please click here.
Your Name:
* Comments will be reviewed and posted in a timely fashion
* All fields are required
What color is the sky?
(For spam prevention, thanks)