Log In   ·   Become A Member

United States Supreme Court Takes On Broad Reaching Fair Housing Issue

John A. Viteritti

  |   1 Comment · Print Article

The pending Supreme Court decision is of grave concern to Fair Housing advocates as well as local governments. (Photo: "Inside the United States Supreme Court" by Phil Roeder)

In 1866, Congress passed the first Civil Rights Act intended to guarantee equal housing opportunities to all citizens regardless of race or color.

Starting in 1968, the United States Congress passed Fair Housing Laws making it illegal to refuse to sell, rent "or otherwise make unavailable or deny" a property to anyone because of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, and family status. States and local governments have broaden the categories of protected classes, including New York State and Nassau and Suffolk Counties.

On January 21, 2015, the Supreme Court agreed to address the issue: does the law require that the discrimination be intentional, or does it allow plaintiffs to claim "disparate effect," a discriminatory effect regardless of intent?

An editorial published in the January 22, 2015 issue of the "New York Times" stated: "If ever there was a legal issue that appeared to be settled, this is it. Over four decades, every one of 11 federal appeals courts to consider the law has found that it covers claims of discriminatory effect."

On December 6, 2013 the U.S. Eastern District Court of N.Y. arrived at that conclusion in Mhany Management Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Garden City located in Nassau County. In that case, a significant number of residents voiced their opposition to a zoning change that would result in the construction of a number of multi-family units that would be more affordable to people of incomes lower than the Village's current residents. It demonstrated that the Village had a minority population well below the norm of other Nassau County communities, had no Federally-Assisted Section 8 tenants, and had turned down government incentives to develop affordable housing. The Court also inferred that the Board of Trustees capitulated to the protests of the community residents. Under the theory of disparate treatment, "a plaintiff can establish a prima facie case by showing that animus against a protected group was a significant factor in the position taken by the municipal decision-makers themselves or by those to whom the decision-makers were knowingly responsive." It further stated. "A decision-maker has a duty not to allow illegal prejudices of the majority to influence the decision-making process. A discriminatory act in no less illegal simply because it enjoys broad public support."

Race is not the only issue that may presumably give rise to claims of disparate treatment. A community's preference for senior citizen housing, for instance, may give rise to a claim of disparate effect for families with children, which are also protected under the Federal Fair Housing Act. Residential co-ops that have received tax benefits for making a percentage of units available to purchases of lower income but don't have access to the same amenities as those who paid more for their units and as well as higher maintenance fees, is claimed, by some, to constitute disparate effect.

The pending Supreme Court decision is of grave concern to Fair Housing advocates as well as local governments. On two previous occasions the Court had agreed to review cases but both were settled between the parties. The pending case gives the Court its opportunity to address the issue.


John is a St. John's University graduate, licensed Real Estate broker, lecturer, teaches real estate license classes at LIU, NYU, and Cook Maran Real Estate School, and is a well-respected consultant to the real estate industry. www.johnaviteritti.com


Guest (John A. Viteritti) from Laurel, NY says::
On June 25,2015, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 upholding disparate treatment as a fair housing law violation.
Jun 27, 2015 3:52 pm

 

Submit Your Comment

Please note, you are not currently logged in. Your comment will be submitted as a guest.
To submit your comment as a member, please click here.
Your Name:
Location:*
Comments:*
* Comments will be reviewed and posted in a timely fashion
* All fields are required
Question:*
What color is the sky?
(For spam prevention, thanks)
 
 
 
http://www.hamptons.com/gallery/ads/1824.gif
http://www.hamptons.com/gallery/ads/1979.gif
Gary R. DePersia, Corcoran Real Estate
With over $2 billion in transactions, Gary DePersia is consistently ranked among the top producers in the Hamptons. A year-on-year member of The Corcoran Group President’s Council, he has qualified as a national list maker since 2007. In the 2016 REAL Trends & The Wall Street Journal list of America’s top real estate professionals, he was designated #22 nationally and #5 in the Hamptons by volume with nearly $200 million of transactions for the past year.

Bridgehampton National Bank
For over 100 years Bridgehampton National Bank has been the East End's hometown bank. Many success stories...one bank, BNB!

Advertise on Hamptons.com - Have your business be seen by over 2 million viewers including NEW searches
Hamptons.com- Our exclusive online magazine has 2.6 million Page Views YTD for 2015. Contact us to join our elite group of clients that benefit from having a presence on the Hamptons award winning publication www.Hamptons.com

Hamptons Carpet One Floor & Home
We pay less,and so do you.With over 1,000 stores in our buying group, we can get the lowest prices from the best flooring manufacturers — and pass the savings on to you.Visit our other locations: Hamptons Carpet One Floor & Home, 675 North Sea Road,Southampton, NY 11968