Welcome to Hamptons.com's Members Only section!

Members Only

Username:
Password:

 Remember me

in the news

« top stories

Added: February 2, 2010

   Share    Print    Email

NY Supreme Court Annuls Southampton Trustees' Approval Of Dockers Marina

  |   5 Comments

Peconic Baykeeper Kevin McAllister keeps a vigilant watch on our waterways. (Douglas Harrington)

Quogue - After years of fighting an ill-conceived plan to expand a non-conforming marina located at 94 Dune Road at the restaurant known as Dockers, Peconic Baykeeper has scored an important legal victory.

Speaking with Peconic Baykeeper Kevin McAllister today he relayed "Obviously we are very pleased by this decision and ultimately by compelling the Southampton Trustees to follow SEQRA it ensures greater communication amongst the regulatory agencies that would be involved in a project, and just leads to greater disclosure and transparency."

In a succinct decision rendered on January 22, Supreme Court Justice John J. J. Jones, Jr. ruled that the Trustees are in fact an agency of the state, and as such, are obligated to comply with State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). Citing the Trustees' failure to comply with state law, the court voided the previously issued permit and enjoined the Trustees from issuing any further permits until compliance with the provisions of SEQRA have been met. Peconic Baykeeper commenced the Article 78 proceeding in State Supreme Court in February 2008 in response to the Southampton Town Trustees' approval of the project on October 6, 2008.

"Although the present marina plan was significantly scaled back from the original version, it remains a misguided project that will degrade habitat and water quality, and result in the closure of shellfish beds that currently support year-round harvesting."

"The site is located in the heart of state and federally designated significant fish and wildlife habitat in Shinnecock Bay. Encouraging boating over highly productive flats and shoals would inevitably lead to groundings and likely form the basis for renewed calls for dredging. Marinas are necessary for the commercial and recreational use of coastal waters, but should be kept where they belong, adjacent to deep water and channels and not in a remote corner of pristine marine waters."

Throughout the review process the Trustees dismissed repeated assertions that they are obligated to coordinate environmental review with other regulatory agencies as required by SEQRA. McAllister stated, "Commencing this action was necessary to protect a valuable resource and to impose proper procedures on the Trustee permitting process. SEQRA requires communications between public agencies to ensure full disclosure to ultimately better protect the environment. The Trustees now must protect the public interest by adhering to the tenets of SEQRA."

McAllister further elaborated "At the end of the day it ensures greater environment protection, and this is a significant decision in that both Southampton and Easthampton Trustees by virtue of their creation have long held that they are exempt from state law, and this decision affirms that they are, in fact, an agency of the state and therefore must comply with state laws."



Comments

Guest (Guest) from 11964 says:
Kevin McAllister should be ashamed for waisting Taxpayer Time and Money his position needs to be eliminated or phased out.

Guest (JDPE) from E. Quogue says:
That area should not have any boat slips or mariners. 16 or less slips is meaningless. Many boats will just anchor there and create a boating traffic jam. The area is a nature preserve and should be treated as such. It is late in the game as there has been much damage to the wildlife in the area by "ALL". The excessive harvesting of horseshoe crabs, jet skies, overfishing with weir nets, excessive pleasure boats and big "Donzie" boats etc. has produced major damage. Refocus is necessary for marine wildlife to survive. Get rid of the "Neptune" wildlife.

Guest (clammer) from Shinnecock Shores says:
Anyone who knows the bay would agree. Any vessel with a draft is invariably going to be grounded at some point traversing the flats. It is an estuary we rely upon. I can imagine the Sunday boaters trying to bring their floating Cadillacs with the cushy seats in. Seatow would need 100 yards of line to pull them out, after someone had to walk the line through the muck bottom to coonect the two vessels. It's bad enough that the bay turns dirty from Memorial day until after Labor day. A marina there would spell devastation for a variety of species. Larry Hoffman - give up!

Guest (almostg-d) from hampton bays says:
Kevin is just an environmental advocate for money. he banks on publicity for donations to support his private albeit not for profit corporation to which there is no restriction for him to earn a high salary. The legal battle was and is over power and has little to do with the Dockers thing. they already have a marina anyway.

Guest (phaedrus) from Southampton says:
This is a great victory for our environment and all the people who work to protect it. For as long as I can remember, the trustees have been nothing more than a processing board for docks, bulkheads, revetments and now marinas in a pristine area. Thank God for Judge Jones and the tenacity of our Baykeeper who works so hard and at geat odds against the forces of development and ill conceived programs. Now there will be an opportunity to retain and improve that sacred area of Shinnecock Bay. Thank you Kevin McAllister.

Submit Your Comment

Please note, you are not currently logged in. Your comment will be submitted as a guest. To submit your comment as a member, please click here.
Your Name:
Location:*
Comments:*
* Comments will be reviewed and posted in a timely fashion
* All fields are required
Question:*
What color is a firetruck?
(For spam prevention, thanks)
 
http://www.hamptons.com/gallery/ads/1153.gif
http://www.hamptons.com/gallery/ads/586.gif
http://www.hamptons.com/gallery/ads/958.gif