Welcome to Hamptons.com's Members Only section!

Members Only

Username:
Password:

 Remember me

in the news

« politics

Originally Added: November 10, 2011

Thiele Sponsored Legislation Would Extend The 'Millionaire Tax'

Monies Not To Be Used For State Spending

Sag Harbor - As we approach the start of the 2012 State Budget in Albany, the most discussed issue is the extension of the so-called "Millionaire Tax."

The proposal would extend for another year the existing tax rate on those earning more than a $1,000,000 a year at 8.97 percent. The rate on millionaires would be reduced to 6.85 percent on December 31, if no action is taken in Albany.

The surcharge generates upwards of $4 billion a year.

Proponents state that the additional funding is necessary to maintain state spending and programs. Opponents say the additional tax will injure the states economic recovery. In 2009, I voted against this tax surcharge because the surcharge was imposed not on millionaires but those with incomes of $250,000 or more, and the revenue was used to fuel one of the biggest spending increases in New York State history. We could ill-afford such a tax and spending policy in the middle of a recession.

Under Governor Andrew Cuomo, the State of New York has begun to get its fiscal house in order. A $10 billion budget deficit was eliminated with no new taxes or borrowing. Medicaid costs were brought under control. State bureaucracy was consolidated. A two percent real property tax cap was implemented to control local government property taxes.

However, we are far from finished - 2012 will be a critical year to move New York State forward. Here are the facts: If the tax rate returns to 6.85 percent for
those making $1 million or more, they will be paying the same tax rate as a family of four making $40,000 a year. Although I represent the Hamptons, not one millionaire has contacted me to complain about the 8.97 percent rate or has said they are leaving the State. At the same time, my office continues to be inundated by middle class residents who are being overwhelmed by real property taxes. Many have left the State. The two percent property tax cap was a good first step, but only a first step. New Yorkers need property tax reduction, not just a cap.

We don't need to give State government more money to spend, but we do need to have a fair tax policy reflecting the ability to pay. That is why I am sponsoring A.7673. This legislation is quite simple. It would extend the existing 8.97 percent tax rate on millionaires. The legislation would also create a real property tax "circuit breaker" program for middle class
homeowners earning $250,000 or less. The legislation would cap property taxes based upon a percentage of income reflecting the ability to pay.

Excess property taxes would be refunded through an income tax credit. This would reduce property tax payments by the middle class by $2.3 billion dollars. The remaining revenue would be placed in a separate account for state aid to education, further reducing school taxes and maintaining education quality.

The combination of the two percent property tax cap, the middle class circuit breaker property tax credit, and shifting education costs to the state income tax and away from the local property tax would provide real tax relief for working and middle class New Yorkers. It is fair and
equitable and is the path to real economic recovery for Long Island and all of New York.


Related Articles:

Comments

There are no comments on this article

Submit Your Comment

Please note, you are not currently logged in. Your comment will be submitted as a guest. To submit your comment as a member, please click here.
Your Name:
Location:*
Comments:*
* Comments will be reviewed and posted in a timely fashion
* All fields are required
Question:*
Please type the word 'water'
(For spam prevention, thanks)
 
http://www.hamptons.com/gallery/ads/804.gif
http://www.hamptons.com/gallery/ads/1034.gif