Welcome to Hamptons.com's Members Only section!

Members Only

Username:
Password:

 Remember me

in the news

« for the record

Originally Added: October 6, 2011

Thiele: Climate Change And Global Warming Are Increasingly Dangerous Threats

7 Comments
Sag Harbor - "Climate change and global warming are very real and advancing problems that need to be addressed. While a misinformation campaign financed by powerful special interests has tried to cast doubt on the science behind these environmental threats, it's important to note that 97 percent to 98 percent of researchers in the field agree that global warming is man-made, according to the National Academy of Sciences.

Climate change refers to the issue that the Earth is getting warmer in some areas, but cooler in others. It threatens to impact the sustainability of our water supply, cause significant changes in our agriculture and create drastic weather like severe floods, extended heat waves and record-setting storms - all of which can have devastating effects on our communities. In 2010, the Pentagon released a report stating that climate change could become a security threat that imperils American lives.

Hand-in-hand with climate change is the problem of global warming. It occurs when many of the sun's rays and the heat brought into the atmosphere by pollutants like carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane get trapped, causing temperatures to climb worldwide. And while it may not be a story every night on the evening news, global warming isn't showing any signs of slowing down. Over the past 50 years, the average global temperature has increased at the fastest rate in recorded history, with the 10 hottest years on record having all occurred since 1990. As a result, glaciers melt, sea levels rise, hurricanes and other tropical storms become stronger and less fresh water
becomes available as the temperatures climb. Recently, Tropical Storms Irene and Lee devastated communities across the state and the threat of flooding caused mandatory evacuations in New York City.

Humans are greatly accelerating this process by burning fossil fuels and cutting down forests. Coal-burning power plants are the largest U.S. source of carbon dioxide pollution - they produce 2.5 billion tons every year. Automobiles, the second largest source, create nearly 1.5 billion tons of CO2 annually.

And while the Earth's overall temperature is increasing, climate change explains the drastic cold periods that some parts of the Earth have and will experience. The circulation of the world's oceanic currents also works to regulate the global climate. It does so by transporting heat carried by ocean currents, which together form the "great ocean conveyor." Europe has typically been kept warm by this circulation, but new evidence suggests that much colder winters are on the horizon. Instead of the regular warm winds coming from the Atlantic Ocean's currents, there are now cold northerly Arctic winds coming down, moving through much of Europe.

Worldwide efforts were made to address global warming in 1997 through the Kyoto Protocol, an international environmental treaty that aimed to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, which was signed and ratified by 191 nations. Former President Bill Clinton signed the protocol in 1998. But in 2001, while nations across the globe began gearing up for the necessary changes, the United States sat idly by, led carelessly by former President George W. Bush, who ensured we were the only nation that refused to ratify the protocol. Then, in March 2001, the Bush administration withdrew the United States from the treaty. This further hindered and damaged the United States' stance and efforts toward scaling back greenhouse gas emissions and for nearly a decade the Bush Administration continued to ignore this issue, sweeping it under the rug, warning that global warming was "just hot air."

It wasn't until 2010 that the U.S. joined the United Nations Climate Change Conference, held in Cancun, Mexico. Although only minimal advances were made, it helped lay the foundation for greater change in the future. Keeping the momentum moving in the right direction, the Environmental Protection Agency imposed its first regulations related to greenhouse-gas emissions in the United States on January 2, 2011.

New York must do its part to help slow the effects of global warming. Earlier this year, the Assembly passed legislation I supported to combat this issue. The first would establish greenhouse-gas limits and a greenhouse-gas reporting system (A.5346) and the second would enact the "New York State Healthy and Green Procurement Act" (A.6366-A).

I'll continue my efforts to ensure we control pollution and create cleaner energy so that our families have a healthy New York to live in.

From the office of Assemblyman Fred Thiele


Related Articles:

Comments

Guest (mememine) from mememine69@sify.com says:
OccupyWallStreet's list of demands does not include Climate Change and instead mentions energy etc. but no mention of DEATH BY CO2. Why? Because carbon trading markets run by corporations and TAXING the AIR are no longer the answers to what has become the CO2 exaggeration and mistake.

Guest (Philip Haddad) from Alvin, Texas says:
It is not the carbon dioxide that causes global warming. It is the heat generated by all the energy we consume. In 2008 we emitted 50x10E16 BTUs into an atmosphere of 5.3x10E18 kilograms. This was enough to raise the temperature more than twice the reported average of actual rise. It would have risen more were it not for things like melting glaciers. It is heat, not CO2. We have prominent industrialists and physicists trying to promote advanced nuclear power, which adds, in total heat, twice their megawatt-hr production. We have proposals to remove the CO2 from stacks and sequester it. Totally ridiculous. CO2 helps cool the earth through photosynthesis. A new energy conference should penalize heat sources and give credits for tree planting and nurture.

Guest (Marvincooley) from Bumble Bee AZ. says:
There is no use to deny global warming any more. It is happening and we must get serious and do something about the situation. Here are a few suggestions: Offer a 100% tax credit on photovoltaic and wind energy instillation that take a house or building off grid. In addition eliminate all property taxes forever on such a property. Offer a ten million dollar or more price to the first successful conversion of an automobile that operates on water based on the least expensive and most efficient conversion. This would be a good start.

Guest (charles) from Ky. says:
Just watched history of the earth in two hours on the history channel. It said that there were jungles at the poles 50 million years ago.How did that happen with no humans or suv's around? We as humans are pretty arrogant to think we are so smart that we know everything.

Guest (Wimal Dissanayake) from Sri lanka says:
I read this letter .I got very good knowledge about the global warming and its treats to the world thanking you!.


dobermanmacleod ...

dobermanmacleod says:
There is a new clean energy technology that is 1/10th the cost of coal. Don’t believe me? Watch this video by a Nobel prize winner in physics: http://pesn.com/2011/06/23/9501856_Nobel_laureate_touts_E-Cat_cold_fusion/ Still don’t believe me? It convinced the Swedish Skeptics Society: http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3144827.ece LENR using nickel. Incredibly: Ni+H+K2CO3(heated under pressure)=Cu+lots of heat. Here is a detailed description of the device and formula from a US government contract: www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GernertNnascenthyd.pdf Still don’t believe me? A major US corporation has bought the rights to sell the 1 megawatt Rossi E-Cat, and it will be announced late October in the US, with the unit hitting the market in 2011. How can any fossil fuel compete with such cheap energy (and clean to boot!). By the way, here is a current survey of all the companies that are bringing LENR to commercialization: http://www.cleantechblog.com/2011/08/the-new-breed-of-energy-catalyzers-ready-for-commercialization.html

Guest (Bill Cashman) from Sydney, Australia says:
Sadly, the US were not the only ones to refuse to sign Kyoto. The former Conservative government here in Australia also refused, despite then bi-partisan support for an ETS. Subsequently that government was defeated - partially because of the slow response to climate change - and replaced by a more progressive party. Unfortunately, they too developed cold feet in the face of an onslaught from massed Conservative fear- mongers ("action on climate change will send you broke", "ETS schemes are part of a global conspiarcy" etc), and now - several years later - when they are trying to launch a carbon price, they are likely to be dumped from office, bringing back the Conservatives and complete inaction. Why is this all so hard?

Submit Your Comment

Please note, you are not currently logged in. Your comment will be submitted as a guest. To submit your comment as a member, please click here.
Your Name:
Location:*
Comments:*
* Comments will be reviewed and posted in a timely fashion
* All fields are required
Question:*
What color is the sky?
(For spam prevention, thanks)
 
http://www.hamptons.com/gallery/ads/804.gif